{"id":2800,"date":"2015-05-20T14:37:50","date_gmt":"2015-05-20T06:37:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.appliedpsyj.org\/journal\/?p=2800"},"modified":"2015-05-20T14:38:03","modified_gmt":"2015-05-20T06:38:03","slug":"looking-for-ways-to-meaning-a-note-of-clinical-local-cultural-psychology-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.appliedpsyj.org.tw\/journal\/?p=2800","title":{"rendered":"Looking for Ways to Meaning: A Note of Clinical-Local-Cultural Psychology"},"content":{"rendered":"

Wen-Li Soong<\/strong>
\nDepartment of Psychology\u00a0Fu-Jen Catholic University<\/p>\n

This research note discusses how we can use a culturalpsychological\u00a0perspective to recount the clinical\/local problem. The\u00a0premise of this discussion is that we as an autonomous research\u00a0community are able to start from a practice of psychotherapy. To\u00a0restate this problem, we are not to return to any traditional discourse\u00a0of the Chinese but to start anew from the modernized Chinese, and by\u00a0this way we come across a problem of the presence of the self.
\nFrom the point of view of cultural psychopathology,\u00a0contemporary Chinese speaking world is a world of aphasia and\u00a0neologism, and its basic problem is a difficult problem of speaking of\u00a0things and how its meaning comes about. A clinical practice is usually\u00a0a practice of empirical observations. This objective psychology largely\u00a0overlooks how the human persons exist in a face-to-face way and how\u00a0their co-presence is a mutual interpenetration of being. Thus comes the\u00a0deconstruction of the observation method. When we are now speaking\u00a0for the locally presenting self, we speak in two orders: the speakingout\u00a0and the attention of how we speak back. The cultural happening\u00a0becomes the cultural theorization at the same time. The problem of\u00a0aphasia is now a neologism on the way.
\nTwo cases of this way-faring is presented here to illustrate how\u00a0the two basic words \u201cself\u201d and \u201cobject\u201d are being spoken out. The two\u00a0cases look similar in a certain practice to psychoanalysis, yet they are\u00a0not quite so. In what psychology are we to account for them?<\/p>\n

Keywords: clinical practice, cultural psychology, interpretive analysis,\u00a0meaning<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Wen-Li Soong Department of Psychology\u00a0Fu-Jen Catholic U …<\/span> Read More →<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[123],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-123"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t