{"id":2103,"date":"2015-03-10T20:09:25","date_gmt":"2015-03-10T12:09:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.appliedpsyj.org\/journal\/?p=2103"},"modified":"2015-03-11T16:51:05","modified_gmt":"2015-03-11T08:51:05","slug":"a-critical-examination-of-knowledge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.appliedpsyj.org.tw\/journal\/?p=2103","title":{"rendered":"A Critical Examination of Knowledge"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bo Wang<\/strong>
\nDepartment of Philosophy Nanjing University<\/p>\n

The self-negation of subject since Descartes resulted in the bifurcations of psyche and nature. The psyche was subjectified (which also means the subjectification of philosophy), while nature was naturalized and a \u201cnatural world\u201d was separated from human beings. What followed was the psychologization of the psyche, namely, the psychologization of the practice of the human being, succeeded by the naturalization of the psyche. The psychologized modern Western psychology was the necessary result of the subjectification of the psyche. The subjectification followed two courses: objective and subjective, deeply shaping modern Western psychology. Reflections on this reveal a new horizon of psychology based on mental phenomenology, situated in \u201cobjective relations of intentional actions.\u201d<\/p>\n

Keywords: subject, psychologization,objective relations of intentional actions, mental phenomenology<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bo Wang Department of Philosophy Nanjing University The …<\/span> Read More →<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[143],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2103","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-143"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t